= Сообщение: 1740 из 2391 ================================ RU.FIDONET.DIGEST = От : Vladimir Fyodorov 2:6035/3.1 12 Apr 21 08:46:06 Кому : All 12 Apr 21 08:46:06 Тема : Re: FIDONEWS: Немного статистики относительно PING-роботов FGHI : area://RU.FIDONET.DIGEST?msgid=2:6035/3.1+6073df84 На : area://RU.FIDONET.DIGEST?msgid=2:6035/3.1+602ba26d = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== ==============================================================================
16 Февраля 2021, Vladimir Fyodorov писАл к All следующее:
>> Michiel van der Vlist "пропинговал" узлы нодлиста, у которых указан >> флаг PING, и поделился результатами и некоторыми размышлениями по >> этому поводу в Фидоньюсе. Всего был протестирован 31 узел, 7 из >> которых на PING не ответили.
> Michiel van der Vlist вновь "пропинговал" узлы нодлиста, у которых указан > флаг PING. Вопреки его надеждам, число подобных узлов увеличилось только > на два: 1:229/426 AKA 1:1/0 и 2:5058/104 AKA 2:5058/0. Остальная > статистика ниже.
============================================================================= * Area : FIDONEWS * From : FidoNews Robot, 2:2/2 (12 Апреля 2021 00:51) * Subj : FidoNews 38:15 [01/07]: General Articles ============================================================================= ================================================================= GENERAL ARTICLES =================================================================
PING robot survey, a follow up By Michiel van der Vlist, 2:280/5555
Eight weeks ago I published a PING robot survey. This is a follow up.
I had hoped that my previous article would encourage sysops to add PING funtionality to their systems, but so far the result is only two new PING flags in the nodelist and one sysop who is working on it.
Note that I write PING in capitals. To emphesize the difference between the Fidonet "PING" and the IP level "ping" of the InterNet.
The two new systems are:
1:229/426 AKA 1:1/0 and 2:5058/104 AKA 2:5058/0.
The number of unique systems flying a PING flag in the nodelist is now 38. 10 in Z1, 27 in Z2 and 1 in Z3. Of those 38, 7 fly a PING flag, but have no active PING responder or the system is off-line. They should either have the PING flag removed, fix the PING responder or be removed from the nodelist.
There are 2 systems that list a PING flag in the Z2 pointlist. They respond to a PING.
So here are the results:
Node nr. Reply by/ Always answers from addressed AKA Status | Supports Trace | | AKAs | | |
1:19/10 Mailguard Y
1:116/116 Ping down 1:116/0
1:124/5016 SBBSecho Y N
1:135/300 Ping down 1:135/0
1:229/101 Diskshop Tracker N Y 1:12/0 1:12/1
1:229/426 O/T+ N Y 1:1/0 1:1/130 1:229/0
1:320/119 Ping Service Y Y 1:320/0 1:142/0
1:320/219 Ping Service Y Y 1:1/19 1:320/319 Ping Service Y Y 1:1/119
1:3634/12 SBBSecho N N 1:1/120 18/0 3634/0 3634/12
2:221/1 O/T-Track N Y 2:221/0 2:221/360
2:221/6 Pong @ hpt Y
2:240/1120 Itrack+ N Y 2/1003 240/1200 56/0 530/0 382/0
2:2432/200 Pvt, No Reply
2:2432/920 Node Down
2:2448/1021 PING * N 2:2448/0
2:280/464 Fmail Y Y
2:280/464.112 Fmail Y Y
2:280/5555 Fmail Y Y 2:28/0
2:280/5555.1 Fmail Y Y
2:292/854 Lord of the Ping N N 2:2/0 2/1000 2/1002 292/80
2:292/8125 Fmail Y Y 2:29/0
2:423/39 Robot (Bash) N
2:460/58 Ping Robot Y Y 2:460/0
2:461/79 Node Down
2:463/68 Craxy Mail Robot Y
2:463/2223 Ping Robot N 2:46/200
2:4642/7 Node Down
2:5019/40 Netmail Daemon N Y 2:5019/0
2:5020/545 pong.pl Y
2:5020/601 Node Down
2:5020/846 Ping-Pong Robot Y
2:5020/1042 RNTrack Y
2:5020/2065 FTrack
2:5021/46 Candle Y Y 2:5021/0
2:5053/58 Ping Robot Y
2:5058/104 hpt/lnx Y Y 2:5058/0
2:5080/102 Ping Down
2:6035/3 Ping Robot Y
3:712/848 Mailer-daemon Y Y 3:3/0 3:712/0
* 2:2448/0 is an AKA of 2:2448/1021. But only 2:2448/1021 flies the PING flag and answers on a PING request. =============================================================================
--- GoldED+/OSX 1.1.5-b20180707 * Origin: Esquire Station (2:6035/3.1)
